Quote:
Originally Posted by ddduallyfan
While your looking around that manual, see what Ford thinks is the best way to replace the lost lubricity that the fuel system needs when all manufacturers KNEW years in advance that fuel would go from 500PPM sulfur content to 15 PPM. It should be listed under "Abnormal wear and tear."
|
Probably why
FORD labeled their own anti-gel, lubricity, cetane boost product; NOT 2-CYCLE OIL!!! And I agree, people make different decisions and we are here to help each other, BUT, that should also include informing people when they are about to crater their warranty or use an UN-SCIENTIFIC solution. The lubricity products have all been tested by professionals, including the mixing ratio; not a "trial and error" approach to adding something to a VERY expensive engine.