E-Series VansTechnical discussion of topics related to vans powered by any of the Navistar engines. This covers a broad number of years, but there isn't enough demand to split it any further.
What has the experience been with a non turbo 7.3 at high altitudes, say above 8 or 10 thousand feet? Or even above four thousand feet for that matter.
Am going to (thinking? ) about converting to a camper and considering installing a turbo for high elevations. Keep the boost about one psi. Have not read anything about a turbo causing cavitation. IMHO, since cavitation is caused by expansion and then contraction of the cylinder wall, adding additional fuel will put more force into the explosion causing additional expansion and contraction. Anyhow, cavitation is something I do now want, even if it is free.
Think the cost/performance/benefits might be worth the install in the Rockies and Cascades Mountains?
Lets hear!! Good, bad, indifference.
This is also being posted on the 7.3 non PSD web site. All imputs appreciated.
------------------
High Top Camper
89 E350, 7.3, used as 15 passenger van pool until insurance meet the clouds, now the long body is going to be a camper.
[This message has been edited by rcoakley (edited 12-07-1999).]
__________________
89 Camper
89 E350, 7.3, used as 15 passenger van pool until insurance reached the clouds, now the long body is a live in camper. Camper has only internal mods. Why? Insurance. But have lived in for four weeks at a time so it must be OK.
All OEM except for air conditioner. Oh, some maintenance items have been replaced.
How many miles on this rig? If you have over 80 or so, forget it. Just my opinion. Yes, in the mountains a turbo is the thing to have.
Do turbo's cut the IDI's life? Some say yes, some say no. The real reason the turbo is a good buy is the performance you receive for your$$. If you have more then 80k, or you just don't want to lay out 3k plus$$ for a turbo, contact Stan's Headers. No, you won't get the high altitude performance you would with a turbo, but from the Emails I have received, Stan's products are a big improvement in power for the $$. You'll get other opinions I promise!
Me? My van is stock other then a three inch bank's exhaust. I'm bucks down and can't afford a turbo, nor do I have the $$ for headers.
I am mainly looking for high elevation performance in the Rockies. When I convert to the camper, will not be in a hurry to go from point A to point B. May drive slow so can sight see and other people can blow their horn at me.
Mileage on van is around 63K. Have tried not to lug engine.
Van is completly stock. Except have taken out the bench seats for the van pool.
------------------
High Top Camper
89 E350, 7.3, used as 15 passenger van pool until insurance meet the clouds, now the long body is going to be a camper.
__________________
89 Camper
89 E350, 7.3, used as 15 passenger van pool until insurance reached the clouds, now the long body is a live in camper. Camper has only internal mods. Why? Insurance. But have lived in for four weeks at a time so it must be OK.
All OEM except for air conditioner. Oh, some maintenance items have been replaced.
My PSD has incredible power in the mountains. I could hardly tell the difference between 1000 and 10,000 feet. I would say it is definately worth it. You must have been mistaken when you said you wanted to keep the boost around one psi. How about 10 psi, that would do the trick. I believe the new PSD's run 15 to 20 psi.
------------------
99.5 PSD auto 3.73 LS reg cab 4x4 always working , 8000lb trailer empty ,15k+ loaded, 8.5ft western V-plow ,Banks filter
5000mi per month
__________________
99.5 PSD auto 3.73 LS reg cab 4x4 220k miles 7/03
'03 CC LB Dura/Alli Wifes car/truck
'03 CTD reg dually HO/auto
'03 CTD QC SB HO/auto
AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned
enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share
experiences and opinions as a community.