Ford Diesel Forum / Powerstroke Forum Ford Diesel Forum / Powerstroke Forum
   
Go Back   Diesel Forum - The Diesel Stop.com > 2008-Up Super Duties > 6.4L Power Stroke Engine and Drivetrain
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

6.4L Power Stroke Engine and Drivetrain Discussion of the 6.4L Power Stroke diesel engine and drivetrain in the 2008 Super-Duty trucks. No gas engine discussion allowed except on transmissions and drivetrain that pertain to all models. Please confine discussion of topics in this forum to those items that are specific to the 6.4L Power Stroke engine.

       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-08-2008, 05:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
jet fuel in 6.4

Can jet fuel (kerosine) be used in the new 6.4 that requires ultra low sulfur diesel ? I've run jet A in all my previous ford diesels but this 6.4 seems to go through that " regeneration mode " often if it's running on jet A.

Last edited by SmokeyWren : 06-08-2008 at 06:50 PM. Reason: comply with site rules
paulgbrickman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-08-2008, 06:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Slave Lake, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,973
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Sure you can... whether it's a good plan or not is up for grabs..

....

Last edited by SmokeyWren : 06-08-2008 at 06:50 PM. Reason: comply with site rules
GrampyJim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 09:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
timid1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 171
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulgbrickman View Post
Can jet fuel (kerosine) be used in the new 6.4 that requires ultra low sulfur diesel ? I've run jet A in all my previous ford diesels but this 6.4 seems to go through that " regeneration mode " often if it's running on jet A.
Manual's pretty clear on what you should run. They can't be explicit about everything you can't use; they just tell you what you have to use. Personally, if it were my truck, I wouldn't use anything else other than ULSD.
timid1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 09:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
RatherBNtheWoods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mid-hell,err midsouth
Posts: 948
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Jet-A, and the MIL SPEC version JP-8 have 0.06 wt% sulfur. Low sulfur diesel has 0.035 wt%, and I think ultra low diesel has .001wt% sulfur content. So the regens may be related to burning fuel with 60 times the sulfur. Shouldn't harm the engine, but the exhaust after treatments are prolly suffering. You could take them off, but gramp may let go of his hugging tree and come hunt you down with a stick. He don't like nobody missin' with his planet.

j/k. I have a CAT and everything on my truck.
__________________
Our Raptor RV

12injectors so far
1 FICM
8 glow plugs
1 glow plug control module
1 HPOP
2 EGR valves, plus(cleaned 6 times)
EGR cooler
buzz flash replaced with
heat flash(seems to work quite well)
2 Batteries
8 Tires
Rear brake pads,,,At 105,000 miles.
Enough Rotella to float a boat!
New flywheel/clutch assy(possibly not needed)
Death wobble-FIXED!!ihope
2006 F350 CC LWB Dually XLT Oxford white manual 4x4 6.0 PSD 6 speed. 4.10 LS front and rear,captains chairs, polished forged wheels, sunroof, tow mirrors, tow command brake controller, skid plates. Built May05. 4" turbo back w/modded OEM CAT,turboflow muffler, 100gal aux fuel tank, low profile black toolbox,5th wheel/gooseneck hitch, LineX(hate it), GlowShift fuel pressure gauge and fuel crossover tube. A real pig from a stop, but give me 10' and she'll lite'em up. 88K troublesome miles. Running fairly well for the last 20,000( Let us pray.....).

Last edited by RatherBNtheWoods : 06-08-2008 at 09:44 PM.
RatherBNtheWoods is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 09:49 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 1,441
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Jet A has no lubricant in it at all. You will waste your injectors and who knows what else, in short order. I won,t even use it in my 6.0 for that reason. You might get away with it mixed in an old 7.3 but not in the new systems.
__________________
2004 F-350 Lariat, Supercab 4X4 FX4, DRW
Dark Toreador Red/Silver, 6.0L, Torqueshift Auto, ESOF, 4.10 LS, Camper Package, Dual Alternators. Build Date 6-8-04, Eng 5-28-04, Lance 9.5 Ft Camper.

Past 2002 F-350 Lariat, Supercab 4X4, Toreador
Red, 7.3L, Auto, DRW, Fully Loaded.

Past 94.5 F-250 Lariat, Supercab 4X4, 5 spd 7.3L PSD.
DRJ48 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 08:07 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 422
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Do not use!!!! The sulfur is bad for the DPF.

The low lubricity is bad for the rest of the fuel system.

Why would you do this on a $50k truck??
rlchv70 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 12:04 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 1,263
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchv70 View Post
Do not use!!!! The sulfur is bad for the DPF.

The low lubricity is bad for the rest of the fuel system.

Why would you do this on a $50k truck??
To save a couple bucks per fill-up???
__________________
Sold 7/02/01 2000 F350 XLT CC, 4x4 3.73 LS, Off Road Camper. graphite int, 6 spd. Ox.White, J&J Grill & lighted boards, 10k FEY Drop bumper,(Centurion conversion) 12k Reese receiver. 285's. Duke's Springsteen. (DAC3)
Need me a 7.3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 02:34 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
timid1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 171
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
A couple of bucks saved, over a $6/7k engine?
timid1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 02:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 1,263
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by timid1 View Post
A couple of bucks saved, over a $6/7k engine?
Ha, you havent priced a crate motor lately have you...
__________________
Sold 7/02/01 2000 F350 XLT CC, 4x4 3.73 LS, Off Road Camper. graphite int, 6 spd. Ox.White, J&J Grill & lighted boards, 10k FEY Drop bumper,(Centurion conversion) 12k Reese receiver. 285's. Duke's Springsteen. (DAC3)
Need me a 7.3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 02:29 PM   #10 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Environmental concerns are secondary to the military. I am designing vehicles using a F-550 chassis with the 6.4L engine for the US Air FOrce that are required to use JP-8 as an alternative fuel. Ford has never tested this scenario, so the outcome for the government and Ford is in question
motteson@stinar.com is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 02:00 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 1,263
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by motteson@stinar.com View Post
Environmental concerns are secondary to the military. I am designing vehicles using a F-550 chassis with the 6.4L engine for the US Air FOrce that are required to use JP-8 as an alternative fuel. Ford has never tested this scenario, so the outcome for the government and Ford is in question
Hmmmm, so just roll the dice and see what happens then? If the JP-8 is the question what does Ford say? There arent any new military tatctical applications using any of the new diesels...could be an expensive trial run. What are you desigining?
__________________
Sold 7/02/01 2000 F350 XLT CC, 4x4 3.73 LS, Off Road Camper. graphite int, 6 spd. Ox.White, J&J Grill & lighted boards, 10k FEY Drop bumper,(Centurion conversion) 12k Reese receiver. 285's. Duke's Springsteen. (DAC3)
Need me a 7.3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 07:42 AM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 49
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by motteson@stinar.com View Post
Environmental concerns are secondary to the military. I am designing vehicles using a F-550 chassis with the 6.4L engine for the US Air FOrce that are required to use JP-8 as an alternative fuel. Ford has never tested this scenario, so the outcome for the government and Ford is in question
The Air Force is not "required" to use JP-8 as an alternative fuel. However, most AF equipment is designed to run on JP-8 because of availability in deployed locations. this only works because it is JP-8 not Jet -A. Jet A is the base product for JP-8 but the AF addatizes it for use.

They are required to use bio diesel and E-85 as alternative fuels.
__________________
08 F350 Crew Cab Lariat - Ride Rite bags & Compressor -- Level Kit


RT76 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 10:38 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Motor City, Michigan
Posts: 1,888
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RatherBNtheWoods View Post
Jet-A, and the MIL SPEC version JP-8 have 0.06 wt% sulfur. Low sulfur diesel has 0.035 wt%, and I think ultra low diesel has .001wt% sulfur content. So the regens may be related to burning fuel with 60 times the sulfur. Shouldn't harm the engine, but the exhaust after treatments are prolly suffering. You could take them off, but gramp may let go of his hugging tree and come hunt you down with a stick. He don't like nobody missin' with his planet.
j/k. I have a CAT and everything on my truck.
JP-8 does not contain 0.3% (3,000 ppm) sulfur; it is limited to 0.3% sulfur.
Actual sulfur content varies according to the base stock it's refined from but is typically a tenth of the 0.3% limit.
The JP-8 spec: ASSIST-QuickSearch - Basic Profile
__________________
-
Douglas Campbell [drcampbell ot engineer dat kahm]

1986 Isuzu P'up, 177,673.8 miles. Hella headlights, (highly recommended) DOT C-2 back end. (also recommended) R-12 air conditioner converted to R-406a. 4.1:1 rear axle converted to 3.4:1.
9/22/2007, age 21: Still running well when reluctantly sent away for reincarnation, due to body & frame rust.

The Green Party's candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in Michigan's 9th district (www.gp.org)

Last edited by drcampbell : 06-26-2008 at 03:51 PM.
drcampbell is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 11:40 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Parker, CO USA
Posts: 2,129
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
One other thing, why do it at $7-8 a gallon for Jet A when ULSD is cheaper? Getting it for free or with a discount?
__________________
UApilot
2008 Dodge QuadCab 2500 Big Horn, CTD, 4x4, auto, tube steps, clearance lights
2006 Dodge Megacab 2500 SLT, CTD, 4x4, 6-speed, DVD, sunroof--SOLD--

2006 KTM 950 Adventure S

http://community.webshots.com/user/cumminspower
UApilot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 01:10 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Slave Lake, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,973
iTrader: (0)
My Photos: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by motteson@stinar.com View Post
Environmental concerns are secondary to the military. I am designing vehicles using a F-550 chassis with the 6.4L engine for the US Air FOrce that are required to use JP-8 as an alternative fuel. Ford has never tested this scenario, so the outcome for the government and Ford is in question

It would seem to me that the military has a couple of things the rest of us don't.... Extremely deep pockets is one....

At the same time, it appears that those higher on the food chain have an overwhelming desire to make life miserable for those in the trenches... It would scare the p!ss outta me that you are designing vehicles but have yet to master the shift key.
GrampyJim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Diesel Forum - The Diesel Stop.com > 2008-Up Super Duties > 6.4L Power Stroke Engine and Drivetrain



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center


Sponsors