2011 DRW Fender Flares - Page 2 - Diesel Forum - TheDieselStop.com
Ford Diesel Forum / Powerstroke Forum
Ford Diesel Forum / Powerstroke Forum
Go Back   Diesel Forum - TheDieselStop.com > 2008-2010 Ford Super Duties > 2008- 2010 General Questions

2008- 2010 General Questions General questions related to 2008-Up Super Duty trucks. If it doesn't fit the other categories, post it here. Gas engine discussion that pertains to all models is allowed. Specific gas engine questions should use the Gas Engines forum.

TheDieselstop.com is the premier Diesel Truck Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2009, 06:27 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
guardrail22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: north of Richmond VA
Posts: 3,356
My Photos: (7)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
TheDieselStop.Com Photo Hosting - 2011F450
__________________
New Truck
2008 F450 CC Lariat White/Gold, JAD Solutions Lights, 62 Gal Titan, B&W Hitch, Gold Remote Start, TruckTrunk box, Viair 550+2x2.5gal receiver, 2010 NAV and Sync
____________________
2008 Carrilite XTRM5
____________________
Traded In Nov 07:
2003 F250 CC LB XLT 4x2 PowerStroke, Captains Chairs, White/Parchment, Torqshift, Heated Mirrors, Trailer hitch,

Delivered 11/27/2002
towing a 2005 Pilgrim 306RL-SS w/Hensly Arrow
guardrail22 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-14-2009, 09:18 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
SFC1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 285
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews






It's different, but I wouldn't go so far as to call it ugly. My question is, if Dodge had the shorty fenders back in the early 90's, why the hell did everyone else have to make gargantuan ones? I thought the Mega Cab fenders looked great. What is the functional purpose of having larger fiberglass fenders to crack and break? Besides, It's even more of a PITA to get access to the sides of the bed with those huge things.
SFC1984 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 11:55 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Woodbine, Maryland
Posts: 786
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFC1984 View Post






It's different, but I wouldn't go so far as to call it ugly. My question is, if Dodge had the shorty fenders back in the early 90's, why the hell did everyone else have to make gargantuan ones? I thought the Mega Cab fenders looked great. What is the functional purpose of having larger fiberglass fenders to crack and break? Besides, It's even more of a PITA to get access to the sides of the bed with those huge things.
Sorry but I think they are ugly. They are a good idea but they need to be more aggressive. I agree the old fiberglass broke too easy. The newer flares are not fiberglass. But they do make it hard to get to the bed side. Every time I hook the 5th wheel its a long stretch to get to the hitch handle, and I always worry about scratching the paint.
__________________
2011 F450 K/R ALL Stock and staying that way

2001 F250 Lariat. BTS, DP Tuner, Banks inter-cooler, Banks Turbo upgrades, Banks Exhaust, Banks Exhaust brake,
edinning is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 03:15 PM   #19 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Fredtp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I think my 2010 350 looks better. Just my opinion.
__________________
Purchased November, 2009
2010 Black F350 Lariat
DRW 4x4 Crewcab Long Bed Job 3
6.4L PSD
Tow Command
3.73 Read End
Fredtp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 08:40 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: davie, fl
Posts: 911
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprinks542 View Post
Seems like the whole truck was revamped. Flares look pretty bad. I agree with those that have an 08 thru current model.Looks a lot better.

???????????
the whole truck was not revamped? it has the saem body line as the current truck. the head lights and grill are freshed (if you could call it that) but a not a huge change. the dash is nearly the same too. the cluster upgraded but still a similar look. the seats slightly freshed, and of course the brilliant scientists over at ford, gave us 4 cup holders ofr the front seat of a truck designed to sit two people. 4 equal sized cup holders too. they should have only two or maybe a third at the most but that one would be a different size for smaller cups. then they could have given us a bin of some sorts, but no we get 4 cup holders. the simplest thing, who thought of that? then who approved it?
and yes those fenders are horrible. please keep the buzz going about how ugly they are. the body line of the truck is the same as the current truck, they could easily change it without a whole "revamp" and give us the current fenders (or very similar) on the new truck.
__________________
08 f450 KR 4X4, no roof, no tv, everything else
05 KZ New Vision 41ft toy hauler
03 harley roadking classic
03 honda rubicon
05 bombardier DS650
http://i5.tinypic.com/4ue76eq.jpg
6SPDMANUAL is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 10:31 PM   #21 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Yah never noticed before but the flares look really bad.
fullthrottle1000 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 03:52 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Parts Jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,245
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I am real disappointed in the 2011 fender flairs. They remind me of a 1991 Dodge. The rest of the truck is beautiful.
__________________
2000 F350 SRW Supercab 7.3 PSD
4" MBRP Exhaust with Donaldson M085171 Muffler,
SCT X3 w/DP-Tuner 60T-80T-80E ,
Transgo Equipped 4R100, Autometer Guages,
Donaldson/Motorcraft Air Induction System,
Ford AIC, Northstar 8.5 Adventurer,
Timbren Overloads, Code L Front Springs,
Bilstein Shocks, BFG Commercial TA Rubber,
Hella 700FF Driving Lights

6.0-6.4 PSD Motorcraft Filter Comparison Video

Fuel Quality Video
Parts Jimmy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 04:57 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
SFC1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 285
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I really think it'll look 10x better if it just had some larger wheels and tires on it.


SFC1984 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 08:04 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: davie, fl
Posts: 911
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFC1984 View Post






It's different, but I wouldn't go so far as to call it ugly. My question is, if Dodge had the shorty fenders back in the early 90's, why the hell did everyone else have to make gargantuan ones? I thought the Mega Cab fenders looked great. What is the functional purpose of having larger fiberglass fenders to crack and break? Besides, It's even more of a PITA to get access to the sides of the bed with those huge things.
well sir they actually are not larger, in that they do not stick out any further. the fender has to meet dot requirements, so it sticks out the same amount but it is much sharper, and not flowing, or areodynamic. that fender is ugly. and as far as hitting it or cracking it, they are the same width.
__________________
08 f450 KR 4X4, no roof, no tv, everything else
05 KZ New Vision 41ft toy hauler
03 harley roadking classic
03 honda rubicon
05 bombardier DS650
http://i5.tinypic.com/4ue76eq.jpg
6SPDMANUAL is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 12:35 AM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
SFC1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 285
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6SPDMANUAL View Post
well sir they actually are not larger, in that they do not stick out any further. the fender has to meet dot requirements, so it sticks out the same amount but it is much sharper, and not flowing, or areodynamic. that fender is ugly. and as far as hitting it or cracking it, they are the same width.
I was meaning larger as far as overall surface area of the side of the bed being covered by the fender. Yeah, they are the same width, but smaller in overall dimensions.
SFC1984 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Diesel Forum - TheDieselStop.com > 2008-2010 Ford Super Duties > 2008- 2010 General Questions


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Featured Product
» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» Auto Insurance
» Wheel & Tire Center

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2