Junior Member
Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
I know this is supposed to be a '99+ forum but can't find anywhere else it might fit than 'other'?
I'm looking at buying (very shortly, quick response would be MUCH appreciated!) a '95 F350 with the 7.5L/460 c.i. engine, it has 97,000 miles on it. I'm now being told (by someone who's opinion I respect) that the 460 had trouble with longevity, that in the years it was manufactured it was not really any good over 100k miles?
Can anybody confirm or deny that statement? What goes wrong with them at 100k miles (or thereabouts)? I'm thinking an engine with that mileage is only about halfway thru its lifespan. This particular engine (in the truck I'm looking at) appears to be drip/leak free and starts quickly, runs quiet and strong.
Is there something inherently wrong with the 460 c.i. and does it have longevity problems? Thanks in advance for any help.
zman
I'm looking at buying (very shortly, quick response would be MUCH appreciated!) a '95 F350 with the 7.5L/460 c.i. engine, it has 97,000 miles on it. I'm now being told (by someone who's opinion I respect) that the 460 had trouble with longevity, that in the years it was manufactured it was not really any good over 100k miles?
Can anybody confirm or deny that statement? What goes wrong with them at 100k miles (or thereabouts)? I'm thinking an engine with that mileage is only about halfway thru its lifespan. This particular engine (in the truck I'm looking at) appears to be drip/leak free and starts quickly, runs quiet and strong.
Is there something inherently wrong with the 460 c.i. and does it have longevity problems? Thanks in advance for any help.
zman
Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 1,216
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
I have heard just the opposite- the 460 will run forever with proper maintanence. However, I have never owned one - I'm sure current or former 460 owners will chime in.
I think the '95 is rated at 245 hp/ 400 lb-ft.
Good luck in your decision.
I think the '95 is rated at 245 hp/ 400 lb-ft.
Good luck in your decision.
2004.5 Ram 3500 Quad Laramie Dually 4x4 CTD 48RE 4:10 L/S Bright White
Former:'01 F350 PSD Supercab Shortbed SRW 4x4, ZF6, APX1, Lariat, Black Clearcoat w/Medium Parchment, BFG ATs (285s), Autometer Sport-Comp Pyro/Boost, Bully Dog 4" turbo-back, SP Diesel intake
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
Appreciate the input, wexman. I'm hoping that the 460 is going to live a long time 'cause I'm gonna do this deal!
So good to be back in the Ford 'family of fine cars'!!!
zman
So good to be back in the Ford 'family of fine cars'!!!
zman
Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Peoples Republic of Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,007
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
My brother-in-laws '87 460 is still purring along at 145,000.
Only bad thing about the 460 was it's fuel economy. Big-block = big gas bills.
Only bad thing about the 460 was it's fuel economy. Big-block = big gas bills.
2001 F251 SRW Lariat CC 156 4x4, V10, 4R100 Auto (#3!), 3.73 LS, ESOF, BU sensors
OffRoad, Camper Pkg. Born, KTP: 08-01-00, Delivered: 8-29-00
SCMT, Volant intake, Gibson stainless cat-back exhaust, PML ALu trans pan and diff cover, Snuglid, 285x75R Geolandar AT II+, Edelbrock IAS shocks.
Doing my part to consume petroleum.
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
Appreciate the input, guys. I'm buying this rig!
Now, about those gas bills......screw the middle east!
zman
Now, about those gas bills......screw the middle east!
zman
Senior Member
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
I've had 2 460's in my history of Ford Trucks. My 86 had 180K miles on it when I sold it, and the engine was just as strong as it ever was. I got 14 mpg on the freeway with a 4" lift and 35's. My 95 had 150K miles on it when I sold that, same story as the prior truck. I could get 14-16 mpg out of that truck of the freeway with no lift.
The 460, as I'm sure anybody who knows anything will test to, is a great block. As with any motor, the more care you give it the longer it will perform for you. Keep fresh oil in it and good gas in the tank and it will run strong for a long time. (not to mention the other regular maintanence)
The 460, as I'm sure anybody who knows anything will test to, is a great block. As with any motor, the more care you give it the longer it will perform for you. Keep fresh oil in it and good gas in the tank and it will run strong for a long time. (not to mention the other regular maintanence)
'01 F-350, XLT, V-10, 5 spd, SC, LB, Torreador Red, Weld Outback, ProComp AT's, Line-X, Slide-N-Lock, APC Diamond corners, Flowmaster 40
Just remember- racing stickers may add 5hp but engine chrome adds 10hp!
Senior Member
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
THE 460 IS A STRONG POWER PLANT!!Just take care of it and it will take care of you.!!!!!
You might want to check out http://www.ford-trucks.com
They deal alot with Gas power fords
twinbulls
You might want to check out http://www.ford-trucks.com
They deal alot with Gas power fords
twinbulls
1999.5 F-250 Lariat SD CC SRW LB Loaded V10 auto 4x2 K&N FIPK,Poweraid spacer,muffler deleted,custom seat covers,wood dash kit,tinted windows.BFGs 285s. A-Pillar gauges Tranny temp,oil pres and water temp.Hypertech PP 111 with themostat 160 deg.
ARE Custom Top W/ladder rack,Added a center seat/armrest,Clear corner lenses,TT mirrors, Rancho RS 9000X with incab remote, A work truck you can valet. NRA Life member.
2004 F250 6.0 Harley Davidson 4x4 crewcab
2007 F350 V10 Tow truck with selfloader
2003 F 550 7.3 Crewcab Fith wheel hauler
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: WA State, Arizona , Alaska
Posts: 1,896
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
They are a great engine and they respond very well to a more free flowing exhuast system.
1986 F250,Regular cab,XL,4X4,6.9, 4 speed,
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: British Columbia Southern Corner of the Westcoast
Posts: 5,372
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
I hope you bought shares in a gas station a 460 is a gas pig I know my old F-Superduty I sold 2 weeks ago couldn't hold enough fuel in the tanks to get me very far. The best mileage I got out of that truck was 8 mpg and that was the best put a load on the truck she drops down to 4-5. The 460 does have some jam to it and I used it occasionally but 90% of the time I drove the truck like it had a egg under the pedal. I couldn't stand putting fuel into the truck everyday so I'am looking for a diesel truck I figured my fuel bill must have been around 300 bucks a month and I tried not driving the truck if it didn't make money.
As for longgevity of the 460 it all depends on maintanance keep the oil changed and clean fuel in it the engine should run for a long time.
One last piece of advice told to me by another guy that owned a F-350 4x4 powered by a 460 told me never let the fuel needle get below 1/4 of a tank you won't be making it very far.
KW
As for longgevity of the 460 it all depends on maintanance keep the oil changed and clean fuel in it the engine should run for a long time.
One last piece of advice told to me by another guy that owned a F-350 4x4 powered by a 460 told me never let the fuel needle get below 1/4 of a tank you won't be making it very far.
KW
89 F-Superduty 7.3 N/A 5spd 319,000kms 12x8 flatdeck. Looking for a newer F-Superduty I just can't get over the feeling a F-350 is too light duty for the work. A F-Superduty is what a F-350 should be like something that will carry 8000lbs
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Senior Member
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
This reminds me of several new PSD owners I know. They overstate the diesel mileage of their new truck and understate the gas mileage of their old truck. That way he can justify the high price of the new super duty truck they bought.
I have a 93 460 and get 10 - 12 mpg around town and on the highway. When I am towing I get between 8 - 10. Note I only tow/haul ~6,500 # at the most between a camper and a boat.
I have a 93 460 and get 10 - 12 mpg around town and on the highway. When I am towing I get between 8 - 10. Note I only tow/haul ~6,500 # at the most between a camper and a boat.
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: British Columbia Southern Corner of the Westcoast
Posts: 5,372
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
Having a diesel is worth it here in B.C. Canada as diesel fuel is cheaper than regular gas owning a diesel truck is proven here especially if your working the truck hard. I know I won't be going back to a truck powered by a big block gas just not worth it I'am still searching to find the truck I want and once I get it man it will be nice not filling the truck up everyday.
A 460 is a good engine but you gotta have deep pockets to own one or not drive the truck often neighbours of mine spent 900 bucks in fuel going to Arizona and back in their motorhome. They figured they averaged 9 mpg with the thing and that sounds about right I average 7 and my old F-Superduty was about the same weight.
KW
A 460 is a good engine but you gotta have deep pockets to own one or not drive the truck often neighbours of mine spent 900 bucks in fuel going to Arizona and back in their motorhome. They figured they averaged 9 mpg with the thing and that sounds about right I average 7 and my old F-Superduty was about the same weight.
KW
89 F-Superduty 7.3 N/A 5spd 319,000kms 12x8 flatdeck. Looking for a newer F-Superduty I just can't get over the feeling a F-350 is too light duty for the work. A F-Superduty is what a F-350 should be like something that will carry 8000lbs
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Marlton, NJ -- Home of the Overprivileged!
Posts: 42
My Photos: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
I think the FI 460 gets a bit better mileage than the carbureted version. Don't get me wrong, the old 460's were totally mean mothers when a 4bbl. was thrown at them...why else would they put them in humungous Lincoln's?
Plenty of grunt...never meant to be a race motor in stock form, perfect for a 1-ton Ford...do it dude. You'll be glad you did.
Plenty of grunt...never meant to be a race motor in stock form, perfect for a 1-ton Ford...do it dude. You'll be glad you did.
PREVENT TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS!
--------------------------
Get the elderly OFF THE ROAD!
Member
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
Had a 97 Crewcab with the 460. Owned it from mile 35k to 72k = no problems other than an alternater. MPG was 12 at best, and 10 at the worst, but I tend to drive like an old guy. (no offense old fellers...) I really liked the truck and engine, but didn't own it long enough to comment on longevity.
One point on my truck worth mentioning was that I had to retard the timing quite a bit (don't remember the exact degrees) in order to run 87 gas without a slight ping. I am sure this hurt fuel economy and power. (more foot = worse MPG). If I ran 91, all was fine, but as stated above, the motor was thirsty.
Another consideration that may or may not be of importance to you is the range on the truck. Mine had dual (but small 17&19 gal I think) tanks. Useful range was only 350-400 miles.
If you want it, snap it up. That is really the only reason you need. You only go around once. [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
One point on my truck worth mentioning was that I had to retard the timing quite a bit (don't remember the exact degrees) in order to run 87 gas without a slight ping. I am sure this hurt fuel economy and power. (more foot = worse MPG). If I ran 91, all was fine, but as stated above, the motor was thirsty.
Another consideration that may or may not be of importance to you is the range on the truck. Mine had dual (but small 17&19 gal I think) tanks. Useful range was only 350-400 miles.
If you want it, snap it up. That is really the only reason you need. You only go around once. [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
2002 F250 CC PSD
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
Again, thanks for the input, guys. I agree that life is too short and I bought the truck, simply because I WANTED TO!! So good to be back in a FORD, coming out of a Dodge 3500 because I simply had to have the Cummins Diesel and while I loved it, it was still a Dodge and I'm not a big Dodge fan.
The truck does have the dual tanks just like my F150 did, believe it's 17 and 18 gal for the two. At least it's not as big a PITA to find a gas station as it is a Diesel station, least around these parts.
SOOO good to be back in a FORD.......... [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/cool.gif[/img]
The truck does have the dual tanks just like my F150 did, believe it's 17 and 18 gal for the two. At least it's not as big a PITA to find a gas station as it is a Diesel station, least around these parts.
SOOO good to be back in a FORD.......... [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/cool.gif[/img]
Junior Member
Re: Ford '95 7.5L engine no good?
I have a 92 E350 Super Club Wagon, 460 with 275,000 miles. Still runs grate. Gets around 10 mpg. No engine repairs ever. I use Mobil 1 oil changed every 10K
Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement |
|
|
|
«
'2005 6.8L vs '2016
|
-
»
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
|
|
Display Modes | |
|
Posting Rules | |