Diesel Forum - TheDieselStop.com - Reply to Topic
Off-Topic Discussions This is the area for general banter/chat. There are rules for this section, please read the sticky post in the section before participating. Enter at your own risk as some posts in here may be NSFW

Thread: Looming large "carbon tax" fuel tax increase Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Diesel Forum - TheDieselStop.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
05-30-2008 10:45 PM
AK_Gandy
Quote:
Originally Posted by 06Clone View Post
That was the lightest holiday traffic three day weekend I have driven through since the 70's.
It's also pretty telling to see all of the docks............ with no boats.............lining the Intercoastal.
05-29-2008 06:34 PM
94_turbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alaskapsdvan View Post
Carbon tax ... is that like paying your way out of hell with the Cath church?
05-28-2008 02:08 PM
Alaskapsdvan Carbon tax ... is that like paying your way out of hell with the Cath church?
05-27-2008 09:51 AM
06Clone That was the lightest holiday traffic three day weekend I have driven through since the 70's.
05-22-2008 09:52 AM
PRDATR
Quote:
Originally Posted by roofeditor View Post
But major economic changes in business and peoples lives, I would say it's happening right now.
I have been seeing this locally now for months with no end in site. Less people in resturants, parents skipping meals and smaller towns used to having weekend tourists are seeing less business as people dip further into savings like 401K' and IRA's to pay for the increases in food and fuel.
Business owners have less retained profit to put back into the business and give salary increases which are less and not as frequent.
It is snowballing at a rapid rate as the "Ants" save for what the "Grasshoppers" can't foresee.
05-22-2008 09:12 AM
roofeditor
I don't know about destroy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by checkthisout View Post
You'll be running against me and I have special powers that can make a Chad hang like no Chad has ever hung before.


No seriously though, this issue could literally destroy the country in a matter of a few years.

What are we going to do about it?

But major economic changes in business and peoples lives, I would say it's happening right now.
05-22-2008 05:28 AM
06Clone Shoulda, woulda coulda... The country is bankrupt.

This thread looks like Clam bait to me. Just wait till he chimes in. You are all doomed.

--

Oil is meant to be burned - used veg, tranny or motor oil - filter it, mix it, burn it all. The government lies to us.
05-22-2008 04:40 AM
checkthisout
Quote:
Originally Posted by drcampbell View Post
I daresay I qualify as both "not well known" and "have a clue".

You'll be running against me and I have special powers that can make a Chad hang like no Chad has ever hung before.


No seriously though, this issue could literally destroy the country in a matter of a few years.

What are we going to do about it?
05-22-2008 01:25 AM
drcampbell
Quote:
Originally Posted by checkthisout View Post
... Do any candidates, even the ones that are not well known, have any clue about this issue? ...
I daresay I qualify as both "not well known" and "have a clue".
05-22-2008 01:06 AM
checkthisout
Quote:
Originally Posted by drcampbell View Post
How about we call it the "Department of Energy"?

Imagine if we had put even a 10% carbon tax on domestic fuels and a 50% carbon tax on imported fuels in 1979 (the year of the second Arab oil embargo) and gave the DOE the same funding, mandate and respect we gave NASA in the 1960s.

29 years later, we'd be spending about the same money per gallon but we'd have light rail corridors in every freeway median, AMTRAK schedules that work, 50-100 mi/gal cars, less suburban sprawl, residential energy retrofits, most of the thousands of tons of nuclear waste cleaned up, no need for new refinery capacity; wind farms in Nebraska, solar farms in Nevada, tidal generators in Maine and a robust grid delivering electric power where it's needed; and be spending less money on fuel per year.

Instead, we bought into the myth that collective action is inherently bad and let Exxon & Enron make energy policy.

Like the Fram Filter guy used to say, "Pay me now, or pay me later."

Ever since 1979, Jimmy Carter and the Green Party have been warning us that this day would come.
Sometimes, it sucks to be right.

Understanding economics is not easy.

Even if we paid more for "energy", if the energy was produced here would the country not be "saving" as a whole?

I suppose trade imbalances work if our currency is worth more than everyone elses but that's not the case anymore. It's really turning out to be a perfect storm.

It's definitely negatively impacting the car business. No question about it.

And I totally agree. If the kids at NASA can launch a ship at a comet, Orbit the comet and shoot another little sattelite at it's surface and watch the ensuing carnage, I am sure they are smart enough to look at America's energy situation and say ok, here is what you need to do.

Then after that, we can pay them back by giving them all the money they need to put us on MARS.

I am going to go back to school and finally finish getting my BSME but as we can see, it's not that America lacks intelligence, it's our leaders simply do not have the will-power to what is good for the country as a whole.

Do any candidates, even the ones that are not well known, have any clue about this issue?

Roosevelt did BIIIIIIGGGGGGGG infrasctructure projects to create jobs during the depression, will things have to get that bad before we act and does anyone at this point in time even have the balls or leadership skills to do what he did?
05-21-2008 08:25 PM
roofeditor
I'll go you one more

Quote:
Originally Posted by drcampbell View Post
How about we call it the "Department of Energy"?

Imagine if we had put even a 10% carbon tax on domestic fuels and a 50% carbon tax on imported fuels in 1979 (the year of the second Arab oil embargo) and gave the DOE the same funding, mandate and respect we gave NASA in the 1960s.

29 years later, we'd be spending about the same money per gallon but we'd have light rail corridors in every freeway median, AMTRAK schedules that work, 50-100 mi/gal cars, less suburban sprawl, residential energy retrofits, most of the thousands of tons of nuclear waste cleaned up, no need for new refinery capacity; wind farms in Nebraska, solar farms in Nevada, tidal generators in Maine and a robust grid delivering electric power where it's needed; and be spending less money on fuel per year.

Instead, we bought into the myth that collective action is inherently bad and let Exxon & Enron make energy policy.

Like the Fram Filter guy used to say, "Pay me now, or pay me later."

Ever since 1979, Jimmy Carter and the Green Party have been warning us that this day would come.
Sometimes, it sucks to be right.
50% tax would bankrupt many companies. However a stiff tax on imported energy and how about a tax CREDIT on domestic energy and a DOUBLE credit on alternative domestic energy. Yes I know the credits would go to me but it's better here than over there!
05-21-2008 07:55 PM
jogiba Oil is now up $5.08 to an all time record $134.06 ! And diesel has increased 3x as much as gas since last year.

05-21-2008 05:43 PM
drcampbell How about we call it the "Department of Energy"?

Imagine if we had put even a 10% carbon tax on domestic fuels and a 50% carbon tax on imported fuels in 1979 (the year of the second Arab oil embargo) and gave the DOE the same funding, mandate and respect we gave NASA in the 1960s.

29 years later, we'd be spending about the same money per gallon but we'd have light rail corridors in every freeway median, AMTRAK schedules that work, 50-100 mi/gal cars, less suburban sprawl, residential energy retrofits, most of the thousands of tons of nuclear waste cleaned up, no need for new refinery capacity; wind farms in Nebraska, solar farms in Nevada, tidal generators in Maine and a robust grid delivering electric power where it's needed; and be spending less money on fuel per year.

Instead, we bought into the myth that collective action is inherently bad and let Exxon & Enron make energy policy.

Like the Fram Filter guy used to say, "Pay me now, or pay me later."

Ever since 1979, Jimmy Carter and the Green Party have been warning us that this day would come.
Sometimes, it sucks to be right.
05-21-2008 03:59 PM
checkthisout So what has to happen in order to make the U.S. energy-independent?

More Mass-Transportation but obviously since our populations are not centralized, we have to come up with alternative fuel sources for independent transportation.

There has to be some hard numbers somewhere that say if we add X mass-transporation, mandate Y fuel efficiency etc.....

Why has their not been the creation of a government agency started just for this purpose? It could be called the "Energy Security Agency" or something.

I don't see anything with being "protectionist" when it comes to energy.
05-21-2008 09:14 AM
George C It's the "dumb old man" network doing what it does best.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome