|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|05-30-2008 10:45 PM|
Originally Posted by 06Clone View Post
|05-29-2008 06:34 PM|
Originally Posted by Alaskapsdvan View Post
|05-28-2008 02:08 PM|
|Alaskapsdvan||Carbon tax ... is that like paying your way out of hell with the Cath church?|
|05-27-2008 09:51 AM|
|06Clone||That was the lightest holiday traffic three day weekend I have driven through since the 70's.|
|05-22-2008 09:52 AM|
Originally Posted by roofeditor View Post
Business owners have less retained profit to put back into the business and give salary increases which are less and not as frequent.
It is snowballing at a rapid rate as the "Ants" save for what the "Grasshoppers" can't foresee.
|05-22-2008 09:12 AM|
I don't know about destroy?
Originally Posted by checkthisout View Post
But major economic changes in business and peoples lives, I would say it's happening right now.
|05-22-2008 05:28 AM|
Shoulda, woulda coulda... The country is bankrupt.
This thread looks like Clam bait to me. Just wait till he chimes in. You are all doomed.
Oil is meant to be burned - used veg, tranny or motor oil - filter it, mix it, burn it all. The government lies to us.
|05-22-2008 04:40 AM|
You'll be running against me and I have special powers that can make a Chad hang like no Chad has ever hung before.
No seriously though, this issue could literally destroy the country in a matter of a few years.
What are we going to do about it?
|05-22-2008 01:25 AM|
Originally Posted by checkthisout View Post
|05-22-2008 01:06 AM|
Understanding economics is not easy.
Even if we paid more for "energy", if the energy was produced here would the country not be "saving" as a whole?
I suppose trade imbalances work if our currency is worth more than everyone elses but that's not the case anymore. It's really turning out to be a perfect storm.
It's definitely negatively impacting the car business. No question about it.
And I totally agree. If the kids at NASA can launch a ship at a comet, Orbit the comet and shoot another little sattelite at it's surface and watch the ensuing carnage, I am sure they are smart enough to look at America's energy situation and say ok, here is what you need to do.
Then after that, we can pay them back by giving them all the money they need to put us on MARS.
I am going to go back to school and finally finish getting my BSME but as we can see, it's not that America lacks intelligence, it's our leaders simply do not have the will-power to what is good for the country as a whole.
Do any candidates, even the ones that are not well known, have any clue about this issue?
Roosevelt did BIIIIIIGGGGGGGG infrasctructure projects to create jobs during the depression, will things have to get that bad before we act and does anyone at this point in time even have the balls or leadership skills to do what he did?
|05-21-2008 08:25 PM|
I'll go you one more
|05-21-2008 07:55 PM|
Oil is now up $5.08 to an all time record $134.06 ! And diesel has increased 3x as much as gas since last year.
|05-21-2008 05:43 PM|
How about we call it the "Department of Energy"?
Imagine if we had put even a 10% carbon tax on domestic fuels and a 50% carbon tax on imported fuels in 1979 (the year of the second Arab oil embargo) and gave the DOE the same funding, mandate and respect we gave NASA in the 1960s.
29 years later, we'd be spending about the same money per gallon but we'd have light rail corridors in every freeway median, AMTRAK schedules that work, 50-100 mi/gal cars, less suburban sprawl, residential energy retrofits, most of the thousands of tons of nuclear waste cleaned up, no need for new refinery capacity; wind farms in Nebraska, solar farms in Nevada, tidal generators in Maine and a robust grid delivering electric power where it's needed; and be spending less money on fuel per year.
Instead, we bought into the myth that collective action is inherently bad and let Exxon & Enron make energy policy.
Like the Fram Filter guy used to say, "Pay me now, or pay me later."
Ever since 1979, Jimmy Carter and the Green Party have been warning us that this day would come.
Sometimes, it sucks to be right.
|05-21-2008 03:59 PM|
So what has to happen in order to make the U.S. energy-independent?
More Mass-Transportation but obviously since our populations are not centralized, we have to come up with alternative fuel sources for independent transportation.
There has to be some hard numbers somewhere that say if we add X mass-transporation, mandate Y fuel efficiency etc.....
Why has their not been the creation of a government agency started just for this purpose? It could be called the "Energy Security Agency" or something.
I don't see anything with being "protectionist" when it comes to energy.
|05-21-2008 09:14 AM|
|George C||It's the "dumb old man" network doing what it does best.|
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|