[ QUOTE ]
1) Fittings are not barbed, and there is not a lot of surface area when clamping on to a short pipe reducer. May be OK as long as the vehicle doesn't overheat, but the build up of pressure and heat during a overheat condition may pop them off.
[/ QUOTE ]
I had considered barbs, but at 16psi for pressurized systems (mine is zero pressure), I didn't think it would be needed. Adding a lenght of pipe, a slight flare at the ends, or filing a groove around where the hose attaches should give plenty additional grip to a hose held on by hose clamps at that pressure. I've clamped to strait tubing before with no problems. My motorhome rear heat is all heater hose to straight tube, though it is a longer surface area.
[ QUOTE ]
The hose could be difficult to replace depending on the length of the fuel line coming out of the T.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, on a straight line it gets difficult to slide on, but not impossible. If you built it on a coil, it is probably near impossible to replace without straightening out. I really intended this for short the run from my tank to the filter with one bend, and the longer run from the pump to the engine compartment. Figure it will give fast heat rise compared to just running the line and hose side by side.
[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure you have thought of all this, and I'm not trying to be a pain in the butt,
[/ QUOTE ]
Somebodys got to do it /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Just kidding, thanks for the input. Now everybody has some worst case scenarios to consider. I figure if you had to you could bypass the heater hose line temporarily without having to mess with the fuel line. I'll post if it gives me any problems