The Diesel Stop banner

Convert F250 to F350 SRW

14417 Views 8 Replies 5 Participants Last post by  LCR
I thought about getting a new F350 but decided against $900 payments. I am looking for more payload capacity for my 30' toy hauler. On the scales I am right at my max door sticker payload of 2330# with an empty toyhauler and before I added my 70gal aux tank. Some weight is on the front axle i'm sure but not going to figure out the arm of moment for the aux tank. on the trailer I'm sure the water tanks in front of the axles will add pin weight while loading all the bikes behind the axles will reduce it.

I have read many threads about SRW/DRW conversions but have not found much (one thread) that discusses anything about 250/350SRW swap. I know the 04below had different axles, Am I simply getting confused on the specs for the 05+ 250/350?

If the axles really are different what all do I need to find from a 350 and swap over and what years will work? If the rear axles are the same in 2006 what is needed to increase the payload to that of the 350 just springs? I only tow 10-20 times a year from Houston to DFW then Hallet, OK and NOLA 3 of those trips so a DRW is out of the question.

From the door sticker:
Arpil 06 build date
Short bed 6.0L 4x4
factory 20"
3L axle (e-slip 3.73)
5600# front 6100# rear 10,000 GVWR
Spring code DDFF which from the best I can tell is
DD — F81A-5310-AGD, 5,600 lb
FF — 5560, leaf
1 - 1 of 9 Posts
If the rear axles are the same 10.5" for both 250 and SRW350 what gives the 350 the extra 900lbs rear axle rating?

The rear axles are not the same. Those who claim that all Sterling 10.5" rear axles have the same 9k weight capacity are uninformed.

Ford owns and runs the Sterling axle plant in Sterling, Michigan. The engineers at Ford and Sterling Axle work together to produce the axles with the specs that the Ford designers need. Although the housing and the 10.5" ring gear is the same, there are numerous other parts that determine the actual weight limits of the axle assembly. Axle shafts, bearings, and various gears, for example.

Over the years, the Sterling axle factory built the Sterling 10.5" axle assemblies with weight ratings from 6,000 to 9,000 pounds. Ford specified the 6,084 weight capacity for the '99-'04 F-250 and 6,840 weight capacity for the'99 '04 F-350 SRW. Those weight capacities matched the weight capacities of the tires available at the time for those pickups.

That's no big surprise. If you study cost effectiveness, the higher weight capacity costs more money to produce than the lesser weight capacity. So wasting money by specifying the same axle weight capacity for the F-250 as the F-350 SRW would get the engineer fired by any decent MBA manager. Same for springs and other parts of the suspension. Remember that Ford produced millions of trucks with 10.5" Sterling rear axles, so a few bucks difference in cost per axle adds up in a hurry. Engineers hate us MBAs that hold their feet to the fire on cost per unit, but that's what it takes to make a profit.

Beginning with 2005 model year, Ford increased the GVWR and GAWRs of the SuperDuty SRW pickups. To meet the higher weight specs, the Engineers at Sterling Axle had to redesign the SRW axles to meet the new specs. F-250 rear axle weight capacity was increased from 6,084 to 6,200 pounds and the F-350 SRW rear axle weight capacity was increased from 6,840 to 7,280.

Ford did build one Sterling 10.5" rear axle with weight rating of 9,000 pounds @ground. The 2005-'10 F-350 DRW rear axle was rated at 9,000 pounds for SuperDuty pickups with a 5.4L gas engine, so perhaps that's what confuses the folks that claim all Sterling rear axles were rated at 9,000 pounds. They probably read something on the Sterling website that said the 10.5" axles had weight capacity UP TO 9,000 pounds. (Rear axles behind the more powerful diesel and V-10 engines in duallies were Dana 80 axles rated for 11,000 pounds, not the Sterling 10.5" dually axle behind the 5.4L gas engines.)
See less See more
1 - 1 of 9 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.