If this is not the correct place for this experience I would appreciate an admin. moving the thread to the correct forum.
In my 1999 7.3 F-350 that I've had for over 20 years, I currently have two Duracell batteries which were purchased from Sam's Club 34 months ago. Due to the batteries not having enough juice to start the truck if it sits for more than a night without being driven or on a trickle charger, I went today to have Sam's test the batteries with a view to replacement under warranty, as I was certain at least one of the two batteries was deficient.
The test, results included here with a picture, showed both batteries to be "GOOD" but needing "RECHARGE." Their parameters for "GOOD" are much different than what a 7.3 needs to be "GOOD."
Although the batteries are rated for 850 CCA, one battery read only 714 CCA with the other battery reading 776 CCA. That reduction in CCA to only 714 is hugely deficient from the 850 CCA benchmark, but Sam's says it's close enough.
. They told me to recharge the batteries as the test called for. I pointed out that their tester measured volts at 12.43 and 12.62 volts since I have been driving the truck around all morning and the alternator is certainly doing its job. I pointed out that the serpentine belt and terminal connections are obviously good as the voltage is where it should be. This is strictly a failing battery issue. I then asked how am I supposed to charge them any more than what they currently are since they are both currently over 12 volts. The two Sam's employees just shrugged their shoulders saying they have to go by what the tester tells them.
As you can read on the test slips pictured, it is printed that the average life of these batteries in my area is only 24 months. Here it is 34 months since they were installed. They have exceeded the manufacturers low expectations. Still Sam's would not budge claiming that the tester telling them the batteries are "GOOD" trumps all. They did offer to sell me new batteries. I remarked by asking "why would I purchase more junk that is expected to last for only 24 months despite a 36 month written warranty that is useless due to substandard performance being acceptable?"
I'm off now to buy a set of Motorcraft batteries.
In my 1999 7.3 F-350 that I've had for over 20 years, I currently have two Duracell batteries which were purchased from Sam's Club 34 months ago. Due to the batteries not having enough juice to start the truck if it sits for more than a night without being driven or on a trickle charger, I went today to have Sam's test the batteries with a view to replacement under warranty, as I was certain at least one of the two batteries was deficient.
The test, results included here with a picture, showed both batteries to be "GOOD" but needing "RECHARGE." Their parameters for "GOOD" are much different than what a 7.3 needs to be "GOOD."
Although the batteries are rated for 850 CCA, one battery read only 714 CCA with the other battery reading 776 CCA. That reduction in CCA to only 714 is hugely deficient from the 850 CCA benchmark, but Sam's says it's close enough.
As you can read on the test slips pictured, it is printed that the average life of these batteries in my area is only 24 months. Here it is 34 months since they were installed. They have exceeded the manufacturers low expectations. Still Sam's would not budge claiming that the tester telling them the batteries are "GOOD" trumps all. They did offer to sell me new batteries. I remarked by asking "why would I purchase more junk that is expected to last for only 24 months despite a 36 month written warranty that is useless due to substandard performance being acceptable?"
I'm off now to buy a set of Motorcraft batteries.