Well... what he tried (and failed) to explain was why two batteries in parallel make more power. And it's not (entirely) do to plate area.
You see, E=IR has a few other applications. The circuit has resistance and the batteries have resistance. You don't normally talk about the resistance of a battery unless you have an incredibly high draw. But batteries do have resistance.
When you start your truck, you are going to draw hundreds of amps. Each of the eight glow plugs take power (20A or 40A each, I seem to recall ... they have to go from 0F (cold morning) to 1000F (heating the cylinder) in a few seconds) and then while they are still running, the starter has to crank. I know that gas engine starters are 40-ish-Amps, so I suspect that this truck has an 80 or 100 amp starter.
So while you're trying to draw this power, you run into the limitation of drawing that power at 12V ... and drawing that power from the battery. As you draw more power from the battery, the voltage it offers lowers due to it's internal resistance.
So you can view the two battery situation in several ways. One way to view it is that two batteries in parallel offer less resistance to the circuit. This is the same as larger plate areas in the battery offer less resistance. (Two resistances "n" in parallel offer n/2 resistance.)
In fact you can understand it in whatever way you like. That's how E=IR fits into the situation. People probably tried starting diesels with one battery for awhile. After that got tiresome, they put in two. In fact, on effect is likely that the two batteries allow the system to work further down the age scale of the battery ... such that you might even get more lifetime out of two batteries together than you would out of two single batteries.